EU Public Affairs Monitor - 20/11/08

How to destroy the music business 20th November 2008
"Put yourself in these hypothetical shoes for a moment. My goal is to make as much money as possible by doing as little work as possible. I have no creative talent except for generating and recycling marketing buzzwords. I have no technical knowledge or ability - but I can get my head around a Twitter feed. It doesn't sound promising, but you'll want in, I promise.

Now let's imagine a business that can achieve our goals. The natural place to start this business is on the internet - where one can harness the labour of millions of people and pay them sod all for their work. Under the smokescreen of "collective intelligence" or harnessing "the wisdom of the crowd", we can keep our supply costs at zero. And if we can keep reminding these rubes that "power lies at the edge of the network" or "in the Long Tail", they'll produce lots of stuff for us for nothing, without complaining." [TheRegister]

TechDirt's Backfiring Defense of the Thomas Decision--and the "Effective Freedom" of Totalitarian Terror (Part II) 11.21.2008
"Having dealt with Mr. Masnick's self-immolating attack on my analysis of Thomas, I must now even more emphatically reject Mr. Masnick's absurd claim that he "proved" that my paper on Free Culture mischaracterized the views that Professor Lawrence Lessig expressed in Code, a deplorable book advocating government control of the Internet and lawsuits against programmers. Frankly, mischaracterizing Lessig is pointless: quoting him suffices. Nevertheless, Mr. Masnick claimed, "The worst was when a variety of others pointed out Sydnor's out of context comments [sic] and put them back into context--and Sydnor still stood by the paper, refusing to admit he took a single comment out of content."

Nonsense: I stand by my paper because Mr. Masnick and "others" failed to quibble successfully even about details wholly tangential to its main argument. As Mr. Masnick's post indicates, his quibbles claimed that I had unfairly portrayed Lessig as a "communist sympathizer."" [IPCentral]

Asinine lawsuit from French music interests targets Sourceforge Nov 15th 2008
"Torrent Freak reported yesterday that the SPFF -- think of it as the French RIAA -- filed lawsuits against the developers of P2P clients Vuze, Limewire, and Morpheus. There is also a fourth target, and I'll get to that particular bit of insanity later.

The SPFF's beef is with the fact that these programs don't provide a system to block copyright protected materials from being shared. Because the programs don't prevent files from being shared, the SPFF argues that the programs are complicit in the act itself." [DownloadSquad]

Compare EU Lobbying And Domestic Lobbying Using Two Different States

Development
In the last thirty years increases in the size of the EU and its regulatory influence have resulted in a growth in the amount and the nature of lobbying by private groups, public organisations and governmental actors. Currently, there are something around 15000 lobbyists in Brussels of various sizes and geographical interests.

The dominant actors of the sixties were the groups corresponding to the original intentions of the European Coal and Steel Community and then the European Economic Community. However, the EU’s changing role has resulted in a ballooning of lobbying. Since the 80s single market integration was a catalyst for the growth of lobbying, as private firms and local communities sought to protect their existing markets and communities from potentially damaging reforms. Now lobbying extends to the environment, home affairs, and foreign and security policy.

However, there are concerns that further enlargement will overcrowd debate and cause imbalances, as the EU institutions will have less and less time to listen to individual concerns, thereby reducing the substance of consultation. This is particularly so as it is unlikely that there will be a significant increase in staff relative to the enlargement.

The growing importance of EU policy is now making some national interest groups more Eurocentric or begin to look at issues from a more European perspective, rather than continuing to define problems in purely national terms

Private Lobbying
The largest actor, with over 1,000 organisations and over 250 lawyer groups, consisting of private economic and business interests, the largest of which are the chemicals industry (150), and food and drink (140) as a result of CAP.

There is a preference for ‘pan European’ economic interests, as they tend to get consensus easier than more national centric lobby groups

There is a strong presence of companies from outside the EU, especially the US because of the high levels of investment in Europe.

Public Lobbying
Over 300 public organisations reside in Brussels. The most active are environmental, public health, human rights, and animal welfare NGOs such as Greenpeace.

The EU encourages the smaller organisations and often offers funding as a cost effective way of getting research without the need for a more expensive official research departments. However, groups such as Greenpeace refuse this as they feel that this affects their impartiality.

Government
Brussels has government representation from national embassies and local lobbies. Currently there are over 360 groups of which there are 167 connected non-EU embassies.

EU member states are extremely well represented, especially regional governments, of which the German Lander is particularly influential. However, this has created friction between national and local government, as there are often different priorities. For instance, Scotland’s Highlands and Islands region had to fight to keep its funding in the 1990s. Currently Gordon Brown is trying to coordinate the regional development fund that it receives from the EU.

It has been suggested that EU lobbying allows for issues ignored on a domestic level can get a second change through EU lobbying.

Lobbying
Linguistics is required: French and English are a minimum but also German, Spanish, and even Dutch.

Unlike countries such as the US the lack of a strong party system results in political campaign funds having little effect on political decision-making.

The introduction of new technology has made its presence felt in Brussels, with email being used more extensively than other political capitals and the mass of information on the internet allowing for ease of research. This is felt to be particularly useful to pan-European trade associations which have a huge logistical problem in trying to secure a unified position.

However, face-to-face contact is still important, with a system in place allowing lobbyists the optimum amount of access within the EU parliament. Trips between Belgium and Strasburg are seen as a useful way of forging contacts, through networking on the four hour train journey, over the fine local food and hotel lobbies.

This research was written by Jonathan McHugh in January 2005

References

• Elizabeth Bomberg and Alexander Stubb - The European Union: How Does It Work? Oxford University Press, 2003
• Michelle Cini European Union Politics Oxford University Press 2003